Apa sebenarnya perancangan mereka?
Kena ingat, Lim Guan Eng dan ramai puak DAP beragama Kristian.
Mereka berbangsa Cina yang cauvinis, dan beragama Kristian.
Bermakna mereka membenci Melayu dan melawan Islam.
Open the door to Jerusalem?
Wednesday 1 May 2013
Monday 29 April 2013
Kafir harbi dan orang Kristian
Bagaimana seorang ibu tunggal beragama Islam beranak tiga dibiayai orang Kristian
Pas ikut telunjuk kafir harbi
Sunday 28 April 2013
Bumiputera, for non Bumis - from a sensible Chinese
The only way for Malaysians to move forward is for everyone to integrate. If you migrate to France, you need to speak French. If you want to live in Japan, then speak Japanese.
Indonesian Chinese assimilate and change their names to Indonesian names.
Malaysian Chinese? They speak Mandarin, they speak Hokkien, but not Bahasa Melayu. And yet they want equal rights!
Read this article, coming from a sensible Chinese...he is unfortunately in the minority.
Bumputra, for the non-Bumiputra by Tai Zee Kin
When the constitution was drafted, all malayan thought that was the best compromise.
The chinese and indian immigrants were only there for at most 2 generations (excluding the minority peranakan (chinese) or Chitty Peranakan (indian) who stayed since 1400s).
first i invite you to imagine this scenario. Imagine in 8 years time, the second generations of the 6-8 millions bangladeshis, Indonesians, and Nepalese, started to demand for citizenship, citing that they are born bred in malaysia, speaks BETTER MALAY than many of the malaysians, and live the lifestyle of a Malaysian. my first question is, in what way would you grant MASS citizenship to them?
my grandmother told me, the situation back then was the same. She was a MCA member back then since Tan Cheng Lock. The chinese has No where to cling to. China was in war with Japan and Communist practiced Close door policy. Taiwanese regarded malaysian chinese as “HUA QIAO”, and technically labelled us as if we have perpetually migrated away, like those in US or European chinese .
with that in mind, the only way to settle, was to ASK the then government, british, for mass citizenship, citing contributions to the development to then Malaya/Federation of malay land, and swearing loyalty.
HOWEVER, the native (concept of native was very simple back then, either you are a Nusantarian (from nusantara), or you are NOT nusantarian.
the british were Prepared to Grant mass citizenship to these Chinese people through the Malayan Union Charter, which was intended to make all three : straits settlements (penang melaka singapore), Federated malay states, and non federated malay states, into CROWN COLONIES.
UMNO was then formed to rally the nusantarians (malay) to oppose the Malayan Union charter. Like it or not, they are NOT prepared to allow the british colonial master to GRANT mass citizenship to the then Immigrants who doesn’t intergrate/assimilate into their culture. (i use their, because the racial line back then was VERY clear. no chinese speaks malay!)
British have to succumb to the pressure of UMNO. so were the Chinese. and Tunku was then tasked to find out a grand compromise between the Malays/nusantarians and the Immigrant chinese/indians. the grand compromise, that convinced the then local Malays, to accord these 1st and second generation chinese immigrants MASS citizneship, was that their need to be treated “special”, hence the Reid Commission’s drafting of “special position” in educaiton and economic sectors.
the Chinese back then agreed to it. my father asked me, when then, this notion and consequences from the grand compromise ends? I reckoned that the MAIN premise that causes the grand compromise for mass citizenship, is because of the maintainence of “chineseness” of our grandparents. they started chinese school, insist on communicating in the chinese language, live the life style of chinese.
technically, building another chinese state/province outside china. teaching the values of chinese, reading books from china (pre-cultural revolution) etc. there is no sense of integration whatsoever.
This “MAIN PREMISE” attracts retaliation, which is the “SECONDARY PREMISE” of bumiputra-hood. if you study the concept of bumiputra carefully, you would have realised it’s not sooo much on “protecting the interest of natives”.
the ideology and philosophy of bumiputra concept entails two big aspect. The first aspect is to curb the “chineseness”. Chinese merchants back then, were close to the british rulers. you have peranakans who wear Kerongsang bearing Queen Victoria’s image. you also have chinese chambers of commerce who have british patrons. it shows that apart of foreign control of our economy (Professor Shamsul Amri said, almost 50-60%), the CHinese controlled almost 70% of whats left.
technically speaking, the native Nusantarians has no economic power at all. They were of the view, that if these minority immigrants, after holding such immence economical power, attempts to seize political power, would crush their existence. you can’t blame them for having that thoughts.
it’s a sentiment that is common almost among absolute majority of them. that’s where they need extra assurance if they were to agree to grant mass citizenship.
The second aspect, is the “emotional” insecurity of the existence of large population of “chinese immigrants” and “indian immigrants”.
There is fear of these two large immigrants group (back then), who REFUSE to integrate/assimilate (i know it’s a harsh word to use, but that was exactly the reason), would unite against the native nusantarians (mostly malays) and kill of their religion and culture.
This emotion actual DETERS the nusantarians back then to even AGREE on granting mass citizenship to the 1st and 2nd generation of Immigrants. with these two aspects in mind, the then leader Tunku, will have to find out a way to move forward.
he can either refuse chinese and indian’s mass citizenship request, forcing them to either leaving malayan in stage, or he can find a grand compromise between both. he then, adviced the Reid Commission, to draft the BIGGEST contract ever between the Nusantarians and 1st/2nd generation Immigrants, which is known as article 153 of the Federal COnsituttion.
With the Introduction of Article 153 in the Federal Constitution, the Nusantarians decided that they can do away with both aspect of fearing the intrusion of “chineseness” and “insecurity sentiment” in economical and educational aspect. because their position of NOT being affected by chineseness, and NOT being economically compromised, is protected in the constiution.
Our grand/great grand parents, who were first and second generation immigrants, too, were happy with this grand compromise, in exchange for Mass citizenship. It’s almost impossible, for a country with native people that shares common/ or near common lifestyle, to grant MASS citizneship to 1st/2nd generation immigrant groups who DOES NOT shares their lifesytle/near common lifestyle.
Chinese and INdian refuse to integrate and refuse to assimilate, but are demanding citizenship. The Nusantarian natives of course were against it and they have the numbers to say NO.
CHinese and indian 1st & 2nd generation immigrant then realise it’s “WORTH” entering into such contract, knowing that they have no where else to go. The second best scenario, would be to stay as permanent residents, and NOT being able to gain full citizenship by the native nusantarians. NOT GOOD ENOUGH! they said. they wanted citizenship! If you bear this historical facts in mind, you can then apply to my first case scenario.
you try to imagine, the second/third generation of bangladeshis and nepaliese and indonesians, who make up of 6-9 millions of malaysian population, is demanding the rights of a citizen in malaysia. that includes benefits, fundings, education, healthcares, and also RIGHT TO VOTE. they claimed that they have been paying TAX, contributed to the country, and helped the economic (which is true, look at all the construction workers who put our country into pieces). they also claimed that they are born bred in malaysia and they want MASS citizneship (not individual application, but MASS granting of 6-9 million citizenship).
WHAT DOES IT TAKE, FOR YOU TO GRANT THEM MASS CITIZNESHIP OF 9000000 CITIZENS TO THEM? the Nusantarians were satisfied to grant mass citzienship, as long as they have guarenteed position in educaiton economics whatnot as per Article 153.
how about you? put it back into this situation. TO answer my fathers question, when is this BUMIPUTRA’s concept going to end?
I told him, as long as the aspect of “CHINESENESS” and “INSECURITY” no longer haunts the Nusantarians.
Till now, there are more NUsantarians who found their common grounds with the Chinese and others non – bumi. that’s why you see there are more Malays who are prepared (not alot, but more than last time) to give up the bumiputra status.
But still, the common ground are not strong. Look at the Chinese guy who got punch by KFC. he hold a press conference. this guy, cannot SPEAK english and Malay. and i can tell you, there are HELL LOTS of chinese like that in malaysia. Genevieve Bois and Dimishtra Sittampalam can vouch. they said there are Hell lots of urban chinese who stays in PPR, cannot speak english or malay.
Many of my friends back in Kedah too are like that. These chinese went to chinese primary, CHinese independant, and went to Taiwan/china for their tertiary. or some went to signapore or Europe / US.
THey never did cross path with the Native Nusantarians. They don’t know what is khutbah jumaat. they don’t know why FEMALE malay from Kelantan is called MEK Farhana Roslan They don’t know why MALE malay from PERAK is called YOB Amir Fareed Rahim They don’t know Malay people don’t go to “register” their marriage. They don’t UNDERSTAND the malays’ thoughts and lifestyle. in essence, they refuse to integrate or refuse to find a common ground with the Malays.
EVEN in mamak, chinese are sitting with chinese, malay are sitting with malay. Only a FEW, Minority occasions where three races have no barrier. Not enough! Not enough to tell the massive nusantarians, that they can feel secure now about the “CHINESENESS” effect. not enough to tell the massive nusantarians, that they can “survive” and “feel secure” about their interest in economy and education. Till that happens, till chinese in malaysia decide to tone down our “chineseness” (*not getting rid, just tone down), we cannot do away with bumiputra policies.
it’s too dangerous. The exit clause of the Federal Constitution Contract is clear.
1.) Either we honour it until time immemorial if we are still carrying our ancestors’ legacy (chinese school, chinese language, chinese chamber of commerce, the word “chinese” trumpts over malaysian in education and economical aspect)
or 2.) We assimilate into the Nusantarians. IE, become a malay. That’s the exit clause. But to put the contract to an “END”, we need to find MORE common grounds with the nusantarians.
So it is only right for Nusantarians or Bumiputeras retaliate when they feel their Malayness and rights are being threatened by Chinese who want to have Little China in Tanah Melayu. Already we have two Chinese States being surrounded by Nusantarians...Singapore and Penang!
And check out the video to discover who instigated the May 13 tragedy and the Mao Tze Tung banners displayed intended to provoke Malays
Indonesian Chinese assimilate and change their names to Indonesian names.
Malaysian Chinese? They speak Mandarin, they speak Hokkien, but not Bahasa Melayu. And yet they want equal rights!
Read this article, coming from a sensible Chinese...he is unfortunately in the minority.
Bumputra, for the non-Bumiputra by Tai Zee Kin
When the constitution was drafted, all malayan thought that was the best compromise.
The chinese and indian immigrants were only there for at most 2 generations (excluding the minority peranakan (chinese) or Chitty Peranakan (indian) who stayed since 1400s).
first i invite you to imagine this scenario. Imagine in 8 years time, the second generations of the 6-8 millions bangladeshis, Indonesians, and Nepalese, started to demand for citizenship, citing that they are born bred in malaysia, speaks BETTER MALAY than many of the malaysians, and live the lifestyle of a Malaysian. my first question is, in what way would you grant MASS citizenship to them?
my grandmother told me, the situation back then was the same. She was a MCA member back then since Tan Cheng Lock. The chinese has No where to cling to. China was in war with Japan and Communist practiced Close door policy. Taiwanese regarded malaysian chinese as “HUA QIAO”, and technically labelled us as if we have perpetually migrated away, like those in US or European chinese .
with that in mind, the only way to settle, was to ASK the then government, british, for mass citizenship, citing contributions to the development to then Malaya/Federation of malay land, and swearing loyalty.
HOWEVER, the native (concept of native was very simple back then, either you are a Nusantarian (from nusantara), or you are NOT nusantarian.
the british were Prepared to Grant mass citizenship to these Chinese people through the Malayan Union Charter, which was intended to make all three : straits settlements (penang melaka singapore), Federated malay states, and non federated malay states, into CROWN COLONIES.
UMNO was then formed to rally the nusantarians (malay) to oppose the Malayan Union charter. Like it or not, they are NOT prepared to allow the british colonial master to GRANT mass citizenship to the then Immigrants who doesn’t intergrate/assimilate into their culture. (i use their, because the racial line back then was VERY clear. no chinese speaks malay!)
British have to succumb to the pressure of UMNO. so were the Chinese. and Tunku was then tasked to find out a grand compromise between the Malays/nusantarians and the Immigrant chinese/indians. the grand compromise, that convinced the then local Malays, to accord these 1st and second generation chinese immigrants MASS citizneship, was that their need to be treated “special”, hence the Reid Commission’s drafting of “special position” in educaiton and economic sectors.
the Chinese back then agreed to it. my father asked me, when then, this notion and consequences from the grand compromise ends? I reckoned that the MAIN premise that causes the grand compromise for mass citizenship, is because of the maintainence of “chineseness” of our grandparents. they started chinese school, insist on communicating in the chinese language, live the life style of chinese.
technically, building another chinese state/province outside china. teaching the values of chinese, reading books from china (pre-cultural revolution) etc. there is no sense of integration whatsoever.
This “MAIN PREMISE” attracts retaliation, which is the “SECONDARY PREMISE” of bumiputra-hood. if you study the concept of bumiputra carefully, you would have realised it’s not sooo much on “protecting the interest of natives”.
the ideology and philosophy of bumiputra concept entails two big aspect. The first aspect is to curb the “chineseness”. Chinese merchants back then, were close to the british rulers. you have peranakans who wear Kerongsang bearing Queen Victoria’s image. you also have chinese chambers of commerce who have british patrons. it shows that apart of foreign control of our economy (Professor Shamsul Amri said, almost 50-60%), the CHinese controlled almost 70% of whats left.
This kind of chauvinistic Chinese want to retain their Chineseness, conveniently denying the fact they are Pendatangs...even before seizing power, they have demonstrated their audacity, brashness and above-the-law attitude
technically speaking, the native Nusantarians has no economic power at all. They were of the view, that if these minority immigrants, after holding such immence economical power, attempts to seize political power, would crush their existence. you can’t blame them for having that thoughts.
it’s a sentiment that is common almost among absolute majority of them. that’s where they need extra assurance if they were to agree to grant mass citizenship.
The second aspect, is the “emotional” insecurity of the existence of large population of “chinese immigrants” and “indian immigrants”.
There is fear of these two large immigrants group (back then), who REFUSE to integrate/assimilate (i know it’s a harsh word to use, but that was exactly the reason), would unite against the native nusantarians (mostly malays) and kill of their religion and culture.
This emotion actual DETERS the nusantarians back then to even AGREE on granting mass citizenship to the 1st and 2nd generation of Immigrants. with these two aspects in mind, the then leader Tunku, will have to find out a way to move forward.
he can either refuse chinese and indian’s mass citizenship request, forcing them to either leaving malayan in stage, or he can find a grand compromise between both. he then, adviced the Reid Commission, to draft the BIGGEST contract ever between the Nusantarians and 1st/2nd generation Immigrants, which is known as article 153 of the Federal COnsituttion.
With the Introduction of Article 153 in the Federal Constitution, the Nusantarians decided that they can do away with both aspect of fearing the intrusion of “chineseness” and “insecurity sentiment” in economical and educational aspect. because their position of NOT being affected by chineseness, and NOT being economically compromised, is protected in the constiution.
Our grand/great grand parents, who were first and second generation immigrants, too, were happy with this grand compromise, in exchange for Mass citizenship. It’s almost impossible, for a country with native people that shares common/ or near common lifestyle, to grant MASS citizneship to 1st/2nd generation immigrant groups who DOES NOT shares their lifesytle/near common lifestyle.
Chinese and INdian refuse to integrate and refuse to assimilate, but are demanding citizenship. The Nusantarian natives of course were against it and they have the numbers to say NO.
CHinese and indian 1st & 2nd generation immigrant then realise it’s “WORTH” entering into such contract, knowing that they have no where else to go. The second best scenario, would be to stay as permanent residents, and NOT being able to gain full citizenship by the native nusantarians. NOT GOOD ENOUGH! they said. they wanted citizenship! If you bear this historical facts in mind, you can then apply to my first case scenario.
you try to imagine, the second/third generation of bangladeshis and nepaliese and indonesians, who make up of 6-9 millions of malaysian population, is demanding the rights of a citizen in malaysia. that includes benefits, fundings, education, healthcares, and also RIGHT TO VOTE. they claimed that they have been paying TAX, contributed to the country, and helped the economic (which is true, look at all the construction workers who put our country into pieces). they also claimed that they are born bred in malaysia and they want MASS citizneship (not individual application, but MASS granting of 6-9 million citizenship).
WHAT DOES IT TAKE, FOR YOU TO GRANT THEM MASS CITIZNESHIP OF 9000000 CITIZENS TO THEM? the Nusantarians were satisfied to grant mass citzienship, as long as they have guarenteed position in educaiton economics whatnot as per Article 153.
how about you? put it back into this situation. TO answer my fathers question, when is this BUMIPUTRA’s concept going to end?
I told him, as long as the aspect of “CHINESENESS” and “INSECURITY” no longer haunts the Nusantarians.
Till now, there are more NUsantarians who found their common grounds with the Chinese and others non – bumi. that’s why you see there are more Malays who are prepared (not alot, but more than last time) to give up the bumiputra status.
But still, the common ground are not strong. Look at the Chinese guy who got punch by KFC. he hold a press conference. this guy, cannot SPEAK english and Malay. and i can tell you, there are HELL LOTS of chinese like that in malaysia. Genevieve Bois and Dimishtra Sittampalam can vouch. they said there are Hell lots of urban chinese who stays in PPR, cannot speak english or malay.
Many of my friends back in Kedah too are like that. These chinese went to chinese primary, CHinese independant, and went to Taiwan/china for their tertiary. or some went to signapore or Europe / US.
THey never did cross path with the Native Nusantarians. They don’t know what is khutbah jumaat. they don’t know why FEMALE malay from Kelantan is called MEK Farhana Roslan They don’t know why MALE malay from PERAK is called YOB Amir Fareed Rahim They don’t know Malay people don’t go to “register” their marriage. They don’t UNDERSTAND the malays’ thoughts and lifestyle. in essence, they refuse to integrate or refuse to find a common ground with the Malays.
EVEN in mamak, chinese are sitting with chinese, malay are sitting with malay. Only a FEW, Minority occasions where three races have no barrier. Not enough! Not enough to tell the massive nusantarians, that they can feel secure now about the “CHINESENESS” effect. not enough to tell the massive nusantarians, that they can “survive” and “feel secure” about their interest in economy and education. Till that happens, till chinese in malaysia decide to tone down our “chineseness” (*not getting rid, just tone down), we cannot do away with bumiputra policies.
it’s too dangerous. The exit clause of the Federal Constitution Contract is clear.
1.) Either we honour it until time immemorial if we are still carrying our ancestors’ legacy (chinese school, chinese language, chinese chamber of commerce, the word “chinese” trumpts over malaysian in education and economical aspect)
or 2.) We assimilate into the Nusantarians. IE, become a malay. That’s the exit clause. But to put the contract to an “END”, we need to find MORE common grounds with the nusantarians.
So it is only right for Nusantarians or Bumiputeras retaliate when they feel their Malayness and rights are being threatened by Chinese who want to have Little China in Tanah Melayu. Already we have two Chinese States being surrounded by Nusantarians...Singapore and Penang!
And check out the video to discover who instigated the May 13 tragedy and the Mao Tze Tung banners displayed intended to provoke Malays
Products of PKR
Vivian and Alvin...products of PKR?
Vivian and Alvin...google them are likely to be supporters of Pakatan Rakyat...they have become uncivilised by the day.
Oh pity Malaysia!
Saturday 20 April 2013
Muslim car manufacturer
History will judge Malaysia under the Barisan Nasional reign became the first Muslim nation to manufacture a car. Turkey, Iran and Indonesia have followed suit.
But as usual, Malays mudah lupa. Instigated by chauvinists and betrayers within the family, Si Kitol.
But as usual, Malays mudah lupa. Instigated by chauvinists and betrayers within the family, Si Kitol.
Pulau Pinang dan Kelantan - jom tukar kerajaan
Bacalah luahan rakyat dalam FB
Slh satu perubahan yg d bawa pr ke pulau pinang adalah tiada lg laungan azan, kedai org2 melayu d robohkn n tnh ank melayu d rampas.. Berbangga la anda dgn perubahan itu.. Xmustahil jika mrk berkuasa nasib kita sama dgn neg jiran kita.. Dlm dunia ni tiada pemimpin yg sempurna n xmengejar kebendaan, tp sekurg2 bn dpt memajukan neg, membantu rakyat n nasib kita masih terbela.. Jika pr berkuasa, hak d sama ratakan, fkrkn lah d mana tmpt ank bangsa kita nnti.. Bagaimana dgn nasib ank2 kita.. Kalau pn bkn utk kita, fkrkn lah utk generasi ms dpn... Ms dpn mrk d tgn kita...
Apa bukti kelantan brhk dpt royalti.cakap saje nk mndodoi rakyat.doa sj tanpa usaha x kemana....jmbatan palekbang kg sy tnggal ada batu sj.jln brlubang air karat bkn karat merah tp biru kehitaman. Siang x dok air ...mlm sj ada tu pn 12 mlm....pelaburan x reti nk bw msk. Ada hotel jual... Insya Allah kalu dato' pa jd mb kelate akan berubah wajah....bkn nik aziz sj ore baik ...tok pa pn baik dan brkemampuan utk menerajui KELATE...
Slh satu perubahan yg d bawa pr ke pulau pinang adalah tiada lg laungan azan, kedai org2 melayu d robohkn n tnh ank melayu d rampas.. Berbangga la anda dgn perubahan itu.. Xmustahil jika mrk berkuasa nasib kita sama dgn neg jiran kita.. Dlm dunia ni tiada pemimpin yg sempurna n xmengejar kebendaan, tp sekurg2 bn dpt memajukan neg, membantu rakyat n nasib kita masih terbela.. Jika pr berkuasa, hak d sama ratakan, fkrkn lah d mana tmpt ank bangsa kita nnti.. Bagaimana dgn nasib ank2 kita.. Kalau pn bkn utk kita, fkrkn lah utk generasi ms dpn... Ms dpn mrk d tgn kita...
Apa bukti kelantan brhk dpt royalti.cakap saje nk mndodoi rakyat.doa sj tanpa usaha x kemana....jmbatan palekbang kg sy tnggal ada batu sj.jln brlubang air karat bkn karat merah tp biru kehitaman. Siang x dok air ...mlm sj ada tu pn 12 mlm....pelaburan x reti nk bw msk. Ada hotel jual... Insya Allah kalu dato' pa jd mb kelate akan berubah wajah....bkn nik aziz sj ore baik ...tok pa pn baik dan brkemampuan utk menerajui KELATE...
Mana yang lebih baik?
Fikirlah dengan rasional wahai orang Melayu.
Cuba kaji gambar di atas. Senarai ulamak yang keluar PAS.
Antaranya Ismail Mina, Hassan Ali, Nasharuddin Mat Isa, Kazim Elias.
Senarai Fulamak yang masuk PAS.
Bob Lokman, Hairie Othman...
Sekarang Bob Lokman bercerita pulak pasal akidah...apa komen Bob Lokman pasal Tok Stopa Ali?
Macam Wardina jugak kah? Hentam UMNO konon buat video lucah, politik kotor, tapi bagaimana pembuat aksi dalam video itu?
Ayuh UNDI BN...
Thursday 18 April 2013
Bila Anwar, Azmin dan Stopa mau angkat sumpah?
Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak sudahpun melaksanakan sumpah menafikan kaitan dengan Altantuya.
Anwar Ibrahim, Azmin Ali dan Mustafa Ali bila lagi nak angkat sumpah pasal video?
Hidup Utusan Malaysia
Seorang pemanggil program Hello Malaysia di Bernama TV pada 17 April 2013 bernama Munizam memberitahu audiens yang dia malu membaca Utusan Malaysia tetapi berbangga memegang Sinar Harian.
Mujur geostrategis UTM yang pakar dalam GPS, Dr Azmi Hassan yang ditemani Dr Sidek Baba memangkah Munizam.
Dr Azmi kata malang sekali apabila ramai pembaca yang membiarkan diri mereka diselimuti pemikiran politik apabila membaca akhbar.
Dr Sidek pula mengingatkan kita agar jangan naif dalam politik. Dia tegaskan Utusan Malaysia lidah orang Melayu yang memperjuangkan kepentingan orang Melayu, manakala Sinar Harian berteraskan bisnes.
Ingat, di saat Utusan Malaysia tegas mempertahankan orang Melayu, akhbar Cina bebas mengecam, mengkritik dan menghina serta menuduh Melayu korup.
Jadi siapa yang mahu pertahankan orang Melayu?
Harakah? Suara Keadilan?
Hidup, Utusan Malaysia!
Dalam pada itu Dr Sidek sebut:
"Apabila PAS hendak laksanakan hukum hudud, Karpal Singh kata langkah mayat aku dulu. Sekitar 1997 Karpal cakap dalam Parlimen dan masih tercatat dalam hansard bahawa Anwar peliwat. Sekarang kenapa Karpal mahu Anwar jadi Perdana Menteri kalau Pakatan Rakyat menang? Mereka ada muslihat!"
Mujur geostrategis UTM yang pakar dalam GPS, Dr Azmi Hassan yang ditemani Dr Sidek Baba memangkah Munizam.
Dr Azmi
Dr Azmi kata malang sekali apabila ramai pembaca yang membiarkan diri mereka diselimuti pemikiran politik apabila membaca akhbar.
Dr Sidek pula mengingatkan kita agar jangan naif dalam politik. Dia tegaskan Utusan Malaysia lidah orang Melayu yang memperjuangkan kepentingan orang Melayu, manakala Sinar Harian berteraskan bisnes.
Ingat, di saat Utusan Malaysia tegas mempertahankan orang Melayu, akhbar Cina bebas mengecam, mengkritik dan menghina serta menuduh Melayu korup.
Jadi siapa yang mahu pertahankan orang Melayu?
Harakah? Suara Keadilan?
Hidup, Utusan Malaysia!
Dalam pada itu Dr Sidek sebut:
"Apabila PAS hendak laksanakan hukum hudud, Karpal Singh kata langkah mayat aku dulu. Sekitar 1997 Karpal cakap dalam Parlimen dan masih tercatat dalam hansard bahawa Anwar peliwat. Sekarang kenapa Karpal mahu Anwar jadi Perdana Menteri kalau Pakatan Rakyat menang? Mereka ada muslihat!"
Dr Sidek Baba, kawan rapat Anwar hampir 30 tahun
Wednesday 17 April 2013
Jangan tertipu lagi!
BERSIH...ramai yang sertai BERSIH. Termasuk anak Melayu beragama Islam.
Siapa driving force BERSIH? Ambiga Sreenivasan, bekas presiden Bar Council.
Ia menyembunyikan banyak agenda. antaranya pluralisme yang menuntut kesamarataan beragama di negara ini dipelopori oleh Anwar Ibrahim dan Pakatan rakyat melalui IFC (Inter Faith Council). Mereka mencabar hak dan keistimewaan orang Melayu serta Islam yang termaktub dalam perlembagaan.
IFC adalah intipati perjuangan oleh Ambiga.
Perjuangan mereka menuntut kesamarataan beragama,dalam masa yang sama menggugat Islam agama rasmi negara.
Dengan harapan untuk membawa perjuangan IFC ini ke peringkat antarabangsa,Ambiga Sreenevasan melobi hingga ke PBB dan berharap menjadi pelapor ataupun pemantau bagi pihak PBB di Malaysia mengenai pluralisme.
Pakatan rakyat dan kesemua pemimpin mereka sama sama memperjuangkan IFC, ANCAMAN PENUBUHAN IFC DI MALAYSIA Apa itu IFC(Inter Faith Commission) IFC berasal dari IRC (Inter Religion Council) yang merupakan Suruhanjaya Antara Kepercayaan yang dicadangkan sebagai sebuah badan berkanun yang mempunyai kuasa undang-undang yang boleh mengubah ajaran sesetengah agama (cth: Agama Islam) atas desakan penganut agama lain.
IFC berfungsi seakan SUHAKAM yang turut menerima dan melayan aduan berkaitan agama. IFC ditubuhkan oleh Malaysian Consultative Council Of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism dan Sikhism atau singkatannya MCCBCHS ataupun Majlis Perundingan Malaysia Agama Buddha, Kristian, Hindu dan Sikh melalui memorandum bertarikh 21 Ogos 2001 kepada Majlis Peguam Negara. Matlamat Penubuhan IFC IFC ditubuhkan untuk membolehkan mereka meminda beberapa ajaran asas Islam yang boleh merosakkan akidah umat Islam serta lebih berpihak kepada orang bukan Islam. Tuntutan IFC:
1. Seseorang anak yang dilahirkan oleh ibu bapa Islam tidak seharusnya secara terus menjadi orang Islam.
2. Orang bukan Islam yang telah memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan kebebasan untuk kembali ke agama asal mereka (murtad) dan tidak boleh… dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.
3. Sebarang kes pertukaran agama orang Islam kepada bukan Islam tidak sepatutnya dikendalikan oleh Mahkamah Syariah tetapi dikendalikan oleh Mahkamah Sivil.
4. Tidak perlu dicatatkan di dalam kad pengenalan seseorang Muslim bahawa ia beragama Islam.
5. Orang bukan Islam tidak perlu dikehendaki menganut Islam sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan Orang Islam,Orang Islam hendaklah dibenarkan keluar daripada Islam (murtad) sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan orang bukan Islam tanpa boleh dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.
6. Seseorang atau pasangan suami isteri yang menukar agamanya dengan memeluk Islam tidak patut diberikan hak penjagaan anak.
7. Orang yang bukan Islam yang mempunyai hubungan kekeluargaan dengan seorang yang memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan hak menuntut harta pusakanya selepas kematiannya.
8. Kerajaan hendaklah menyediakan dana yang mencukupi untuk membina dan menyelenggara rumah-rumah ibadat orang bukan Islam sebagaimana kerajaan menyediakan dana yang serupa untuk masjid.
9. Orang bukan Islam hendaklah dibenarkan dan tidak boleh dihalang daripada menggunakan perkataan-perkataan suci Islam dalam percakapan dan sebagainya.
10. Bibel dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan Bahasa Indonesia sepatutnya dibenarkan untuk diedarkan kepada umum secara terbuka.
11. Pelajaran agama bukan Islam untuk penganut agama itu hendaklah diajar di semua sekolah.
12. Program-program berunsur Islam dalam bahasa ibunda sesuatu kaum hendaklah ditiadakan. Program dakwah agama lain selain Islam pula hendaklah dibenarkan untuk disiarkan dalam bahasa ibunda masing-masing.
13. Orang Islam yang membayar zakat tidak sepatutnya dikecualikan daripada membayar cukai pendapatan dan wang Hasil zakat sepatutnya digunakan juga untuk keperluan orang-orang bukan Islam.
14. Sepatutnya Islam tidak disebut sebagai pilihan pertama masyarakat Malaysia seperti dalam soal pakaian menutup aurat kepada pelajar sekolah.
FC ( Interfaith Commission ) iaitu satu gerakan anti-Islam yang didalangi oleh beberapa pemimpin dalam Pakatan Rakyat antaranya adalah Sivarasa a/l Rasiah ( Naib Presiden PKR ), Tian Chua ( Ketua Penerangan PKR ), Ronnie Liu ( Setiausaha Hal Ehwal Pertubuhan Badan Bukan DAP Pusat ), Elizabeth Wong Keat Peng ( Ketua Penerangan Wanita PKR ) dan juga NGO-NGO yang lain. Malah mendapat endorsement Anwar Ibrahim, Nik Aziz, Khalid Samad, Malik Imtiaz, golongan erdorgan PAS dan termasuklah penyokong melayu Islam PAS dan PKR.
PAS juga turut terpalit apabila menyokong penubuhan IFC ini ,buktinya semasa konvensyen PR ,PAS menerima intipati perjuangan Pakatan Rakyat agar mengadakan perbincangan antara agama selaras dengan kehendak IFC yang di dokong oleh DAP dan PKR. Jadi kepada rakyat sekalian jangan jadi manusia yang bodoh tidak nampak yang mana buruk dan yang mana yang baik.Kalau mereka memerintah akan hilang lah Islam di bumi Malaysia ini seperti gugurnya Negara Islam yang dilaungkan oleh PAS selama ini.
Sumber: http://pejuangbangsa57.blogspot.com/2011/06/siapa-ambiga-dan-ifc.html
DEMI MALAYSIA, singkir semua puak pelampau, chauvinis dan ekstremis agama dan politik serta bangsa.
INGAT, Ambiga, Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang ada rumah agam, kereta mewah...semua hasil dasar Kerajaan Perikatan dan Barisan Nasional.
Sekarang mereka mahu kuasa politik...
INGAT...WASPADA...HATI-HATI, JANGAN HANCURKAN MASA DEPAN ANAK CUCU KITA.
Siapa driving force BERSIH? Ambiga Sreenivasan, bekas presiden Bar Council.
Ia menyembunyikan banyak agenda. antaranya pluralisme yang menuntut kesamarataan beragama di negara ini dipelopori oleh Anwar Ibrahim dan Pakatan rakyat melalui IFC (Inter Faith Council). Mereka mencabar hak dan keistimewaan orang Melayu serta Islam yang termaktub dalam perlembagaan.
IFC adalah intipati perjuangan oleh Ambiga.
Perjuangan mereka menuntut kesamarataan beragama,dalam masa yang sama menggugat Islam agama rasmi negara.
Dengan harapan untuk membawa perjuangan IFC ini ke peringkat antarabangsa,Ambiga Sreenevasan melobi hingga ke PBB dan berharap menjadi pelapor ataupun pemantau bagi pihak PBB di Malaysia mengenai pluralisme.
Pakatan rakyat dan kesemua pemimpin mereka sama sama memperjuangkan IFC, ANCAMAN PENUBUHAN IFC DI MALAYSIA Apa itu IFC(Inter Faith Commission) IFC berasal dari IRC (Inter Religion Council) yang merupakan Suruhanjaya Antara Kepercayaan yang dicadangkan sebagai sebuah badan berkanun yang mempunyai kuasa undang-undang yang boleh mengubah ajaran sesetengah agama (cth: Agama Islam) atas desakan penganut agama lain.
IFC berfungsi seakan SUHAKAM yang turut menerima dan melayan aduan berkaitan agama. IFC ditubuhkan oleh Malaysian Consultative Council Of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism dan Sikhism atau singkatannya MCCBCHS ataupun Majlis Perundingan Malaysia Agama Buddha, Kristian, Hindu dan Sikh melalui memorandum bertarikh 21 Ogos 2001 kepada Majlis Peguam Negara. Matlamat Penubuhan IFC IFC ditubuhkan untuk membolehkan mereka meminda beberapa ajaran asas Islam yang boleh merosakkan akidah umat Islam serta lebih berpihak kepada orang bukan Islam. Tuntutan IFC:
1. Seseorang anak yang dilahirkan oleh ibu bapa Islam tidak seharusnya secara terus menjadi orang Islam.
2. Orang bukan Islam yang telah memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan kebebasan untuk kembali ke agama asal mereka (murtad) dan tidak boleh… dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.
3. Sebarang kes pertukaran agama orang Islam kepada bukan Islam tidak sepatutnya dikendalikan oleh Mahkamah Syariah tetapi dikendalikan oleh Mahkamah Sivil.
4. Tidak perlu dicatatkan di dalam kad pengenalan seseorang Muslim bahawa ia beragama Islam.
5. Orang bukan Islam tidak perlu dikehendaki menganut Islam sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan Orang Islam,Orang Islam hendaklah dibenarkan keluar daripada Islam (murtad) sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan orang bukan Islam tanpa boleh dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.
6. Seseorang atau pasangan suami isteri yang menukar agamanya dengan memeluk Islam tidak patut diberikan hak penjagaan anak.
7. Orang yang bukan Islam yang mempunyai hubungan kekeluargaan dengan seorang yang memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan hak menuntut harta pusakanya selepas kematiannya.
8. Kerajaan hendaklah menyediakan dana yang mencukupi untuk membina dan menyelenggara rumah-rumah ibadat orang bukan Islam sebagaimana kerajaan menyediakan dana yang serupa untuk masjid.
9. Orang bukan Islam hendaklah dibenarkan dan tidak boleh dihalang daripada menggunakan perkataan-perkataan suci Islam dalam percakapan dan sebagainya.
10. Bibel dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan Bahasa Indonesia sepatutnya dibenarkan untuk diedarkan kepada umum secara terbuka.
11. Pelajaran agama bukan Islam untuk penganut agama itu hendaklah diajar di semua sekolah.
12. Program-program berunsur Islam dalam bahasa ibunda sesuatu kaum hendaklah ditiadakan. Program dakwah agama lain selain Islam pula hendaklah dibenarkan untuk disiarkan dalam bahasa ibunda masing-masing.
13. Orang Islam yang membayar zakat tidak sepatutnya dikecualikan daripada membayar cukai pendapatan dan wang Hasil zakat sepatutnya digunakan juga untuk keperluan orang-orang bukan Islam.
14. Sepatutnya Islam tidak disebut sebagai pilihan pertama masyarakat Malaysia seperti dalam soal pakaian menutup aurat kepada pelajar sekolah.
FC ( Interfaith Commission ) iaitu satu gerakan anti-Islam yang didalangi oleh beberapa pemimpin dalam Pakatan Rakyat antaranya adalah Sivarasa a/l Rasiah ( Naib Presiden PKR ), Tian Chua ( Ketua Penerangan PKR ), Ronnie Liu ( Setiausaha Hal Ehwal Pertubuhan Badan Bukan DAP Pusat ), Elizabeth Wong Keat Peng ( Ketua Penerangan Wanita PKR ) dan juga NGO-NGO yang lain. Malah mendapat endorsement Anwar Ibrahim, Nik Aziz, Khalid Samad, Malik Imtiaz, golongan erdorgan PAS dan termasuklah penyokong melayu Islam PAS dan PKR.
PAS juga turut terpalit apabila menyokong penubuhan IFC ini ,buktinya semasa konvensyen PR ,PAS menerima intipati perjuangan Pakatan Rakyat agar mengadakan perbincangan antara agama selaras dengan kehendak IFC yang di dokong oleh DAP dan PKR. Jadi kepada rakyat sekalian jangan jadi manusia yang bodoh tidak nampak yang mana buruk dan yang mana yang baik.Kalau mereka memerintah akan hilang lah Islam di bumi Malaysia ini seperti gugurnya Negara Islam yang dilaungkan oleh PAS selama ini.
Sumber: http://pejuangbangsa57.blogspot.com/2011/06/siapa-ambiga-dan-ifc.html
DEMI MALAYSIA, singkir semua puak pelampau, chauvinis dan ekstremis agama dan politik serta bangsa.
INGAT, Ambiga, Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang ada rumah agam, kereta mewah...semua hasil dasar Kerajaan Perikatan dan Barisan Nasional.
Sekarang mereka mahu kuasa politik...
INGAT...WASPADA...HATI-HATI, JANGAN HANCURKAN MASA DEPAN ANAK CUCU KITA.
Kisah video
Hamba masih ingat lagi sekitar 2005 apabila kecoh satu Malaysia isu ketuk ketampi hinggakan sesetengah politikus dakwa wanita yang diarah melakukannya berasal dari China? Mainan politikus sebelah DAP ini mudah. Selain menimbulkan tanda tanya sama ada wanita itu berketurunan Cina atau tidak, yang menjadi sasaran ialah kewibawaan pihak berkuasa seperti polis.
Discrediting the various institutions in the country is one of their agendas. Agenda mereka ialah mencalar imej institusi seperti polis agar mereka dibenci orang ramai. Agenda ini berjaya dibantu media seperti the Sun dan organ parti seperti Harakahdaily dan Suara Keadilan.
Ini sebahagian daripada kempen politics of hate, politik kebencian bagi menimbulkan kemarahan orang ramai agar marah kepada kerajaan.
Kalau ketuk ketampi yang sekadar diambil menerusi telefon bimbit boleh dipercayai ketulenannya, mengapa dua video ini dipertikai kesahihannya?
Kes China doll
Kes spender besar
Sila baca analisis pakar perfileman di sini dan di sini. Jadi jangan buta hati. Buka mata, buka minda.
Melayu dengan Melayu bergaduh, bertepuk tangan Yahudi Asia yang rakus kuasa.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)